O'Reilly is a pompous ass, but he made a great point interviewing Juan Williams tonight. He said he did not believe Dan Rather is a liar, but he was misled--and he tied it to the WMD issue where Bush was misled by evidence that was later found false.
So when someone says, "Bush Lied!" ask them, "Should Dan Rather be fired and rebuked because of these documents? If they believe that Bush lied about WMD based on documentation sourced by the CIA and every intelligence agency in the free world and should not be elected because of it, then Dan Rather should be fired--stripped of his journalistic credentials--and be repudiated by the industry and never be able to work "in this town again."