data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/49950/4995010c580e680feb1bdf2c76898ae9e89c27d3" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/76944/76944f8a722685b3f25765c2626f2c27d9d2783a" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4492b/4492b3b9ae3fc763131a38cc73b1b8ee24c60eba" alt=""
Constant bantering about all things politics and popular...
"But there is an added technique for weakening a nation at its very roots ... The method is simple. It is first, a dissemination of discord. A group - not too large - a group that may be sectional or racial or political - is encouraged to exploit its prejudices through false slogans and emotional appeals. The aim of those who deliberately egg on these groups is to create confusion of counsel, public indecision, political paralysis and, eventually, a state of panic. Sound national policies come to be viewed with a new and unreasoning skepticism ... As a result of these techniques, armament programs may be dangerously delayed. Singleness of national purpose may be undermined. . . . The unity of the state can be so sapped that its strength is destroyed. All this is no idle dream. It has happened time after time, in nation after nation, during the last two years." - FDR, May 26, 1940.
"In an hour-long address punctuated by polite laughter and applause, Gore also accused the Bush administration of working closely "with a network of 'rapid response' digital Brown Shirts who work to pressure reporters and their editors for 'undermining support for our troops."Al Gore, former Vice President, Current Loser
People sometimes ask if I have tried to convince black "leaders" to take a different view on racial issues. Of course not. I wouldn't spend my time trying to persuade the mafia to give up crime. Why should I spend time trying to convince race hustlers to give up victimhood? It's their bread and butter.
"If it were true that conservatives were racist, sexist, homophobic, fascist, stupid, inflexible, angry, and self-righteous, shouldn't their arguments be easy to deconstruct? Someone who is making a point out of anger, ideology, inflexibility, or resentment would presumably construct a flimsy argument. So why can't the argument itself be dismembered rather than the speaker's personal style or hidden motives? Why the evasions?" -- Ann Coulter, P. 10
"'Moderate Republican' is simply how the blabocracy flatters Republicans who vote with the Democrats. If it weren't so conspicuous, the New York Times would start referring to "nice Republicans" and 'mean Republicans.'" -- Ann Coulter, P. 15
"With their infernal racial set-asides, racial quotas, and race norming, liberals share many of the Klan's premises. The Klan sees the world in terms of race and ethnicity. So do liberals! Indeed, liberals and white supremacists are the only people left in America who are neurotically obsessed with race. Conservatives champion a color-blind society." -- Ann Coulter, P. 26
"Liberals pretend to believe that when two random hoodlums kill a gay man in Oklahoma, it's evidence of a national trend, but when a million people buy a book, it proves absolutely nothing about the book-buying public." -- Ann Coulter, P. 103
"Liberals don't believe there is such a thing as "fact" or "truth." Everything is a struggle for power between rival doctrines." -- Ann Coulter, P. 113
"If liberals were prevented from ever again calling Republicans dumb, they would be robbed of half their arguments. To be sure, they would still have "racist," "fascist," "homophobe," "ugly," and a few other highly nuanced arguments in the quiver. But the loss of "dumb" would nearly cripple them." -- Ann Coulter, P. 121
"This is how six-year-olds argue: They call everything "stupid." The left's primary argument is the angry reaction of a helpless child deprived of the ability to mount logical counterarguments. Someday we will turn to the New York Times editorial page and find the Newspaper of Record denouncing President Bush for being a 'penis-head.'" -- Ann Coulter, P. 121
"'Stupid' means one thing: "threatening to the interests of the Democratic Party." The more Conservative the Republican, the more vicious and hysterical the attacks on his intelligence will be." -- Ann Coulter, P. 125
"Liberals hate religion because politics is a religion substitute for liberals and they can't stand the competition." -- Ann Coulter, P. 194
"Most of the time, liberals do not imagine the world is real. Their contribution to political debate is worthless, since even they do not believe things they say. The more shocking and iconoclastic they are, the more fashion points they accrue. Liberal Manhattanites believe in redistribution of their own wealth and ceaseless police brutality like they believe in Martians." -- Ann Coulter, P. 203
The more Al Gore speaks, the better for Republicans. His rants are so far out there that even liberal Democrats can't stand it when he picks up a microphone:"In an hour-long address punctuated by polite laughter and applause, Gore also accused the Bush administration of working closely "with a network of 'rapid response' digital Brown Shirts who work to pressure reporters and their editors for 'undermining support for our troops."'I applaud him for his creative non-use of the word "Nazi."
Either he's become a nutcase, or he was one all along and managed to hide it from the public eye.
This paragraph is typical of a Reuter's release:Gore, a Democrat who lost to Bush in a White House race ultimately decided by the Supreme Court despite winning the popular vote in 2000, cited the recent report by the Sept. 11 commission saying no credible evidence existed of a link between the Iraqi leader and bin Laden.First of all, the Supreme Court didn't decide the 2000 election -- the Electoral College did. Second of all, there is no such thing as a "popular vote." I understand it must be hard for Reuters, being foreign and all, to understand our political system (there are plenty of Americans who don't get it), but this isn't a small point: we're a republic, not a democracy. And finally, the 9/11 Commission did not say that there was no credible evidence of a link between Saddam Hussein and al Qaeda. On the contrary, in statements 15 and 16, they detail the sordid history of the two camps. They say there hasn't been credible evidence that Iraq was directly involved in the September 11 attacks, but nobody ever said that they were.
Al Gore and Reuters... neither have much need for little things called "facts."
In my opinion, I do not believe that bin-Laden and Saddam were Joint-Venture partners in terrorism. Both had very strong ego's and their agendas to rule. It is clear that both had as their goal to rule the Middle East, Africa, Europe, Asia and eventuallt North America. They elected to do this through acts of TERRORISM as a start. They did not have a time schedule, they didn't have a planned alliance, However; Each benefited by the others accomplishments. The fact is, that they really didn't trust each other but because their goals were the same they tolerated ech other. Saddam had greater resources and thus was able to become the center of terrorist training. Saddam provided protection for many terrorist groups including factions of al-Qaida. THIS IS THEIR CONNECTION TO EACH OTHER.Couldn't say it better myself!
The success of bin-Laden (al-Qaida) on 9-11 only frustrated Saddam for he had hopes of being the one to inflict harm to the United States. I think that at this point Saddam became further frustrated and more radical and thus, more predictable. He dared the world to stop him and so we DID, with the help of many of our good friendly nations. This of course, was without the help of France, Canada, Germany and Russia. We pushed him to the end. finding him in a hole with can's of 7-UP and we will find and end the activity of bin-Laden, he can hide in caves or from behind piles of Camel Dung eating from cans of Goat Balls, for only so long and when we do, WILL TERRORISM CONTINUE, YES and all over the world! Remember it took over 8 years to bring down a little "Wallpaper Hanger" and no U.S.President since the middle 50's has been successful in ending TERRORIST activity. Some went at it a harder than others but most initiatives mounted met with failure. We brought down Saddam in 3 years. G.W.Bush is one President who is achiving success.
So, all you kerry, kennedy, moore, clinton, byrd and 9-11 commission lovers stop trying to blame our President, G.W. Bush and his administration for TERRORISM. KEEP YOUR MOUTHS SHUT! it is apparent you are not capable of contributing anything POSITIVE. You are walking a thin line and many of you are only one step away from committing TREASON.
While seated on the bench, an Oklahoma judge used a male enhancement pump, shaved and oiled his nether region, and pleasured himself, state officials charged yesterday in a petition to remove the jurist.
A video located today on Sheik Abu Hamza's website, www.shareeah.org, features four children, doing what as children the world over do: pretending. But what is completely unnerving about this video is what they are pretending. One young boy kneels in front of three other children, in the same manner of the condemned man; Three other children stand behind him in the same way that the terrorists stood over the men prior to their beheading. The three standing children are armed with pretend weapons. One of the three children is a girl. The tallest of the three standing children pretends he is Zarqawi, and reads a list of demands. The film clip ends with the pretend beheading of the kneeling child.
"...nationhood as we know it will be obsolete; all states will recognize a single, global authority."- Strobe Talbott, Deputy Secretary of State, 1994-2001The US withdrew its bid for a resolution keeping our soldiers immune to prosecution from this "one world" Internation Court; we sold out.
Thank you for your condolences and symphathies.If you would like to email your condolences, click here.
It is comfort to us that there are many people like you who shares our sadness.
Please keep praying for Mr. Sun-Il Kim’s family and everyone in Iraq.
The execution has galvanized the people, pushing many into the deployment camp. Preliminary surveys indicate a 20+% jump in the number of respondents who now support the government's plans. If the government is committing itself to operations in Iraq only to satisfy a tacit obligation to support the US in the misguided hope of creating leverage in negotiations concerning the timing of the USFK withdrawal, then support or not, the dispatch should be scrapped. Iraq is not a place for half measures or token forces. But if the government is committed to the long-term agenda of stability and reconstruction, built on street-level security, then the execution of Kim may have given them the support they need.
Ryan and his ex-wife vigorously fought the public disclosure of the files after their existence became known during the primary campaign, arguing that making them public would harm their son.Also, I just saw a statement given to the press by Jeri Ryan says her ex-husband would man an great senator...more to come when I find the quote.
Some had suspected his motives all along. A Detroit News clip from 1971 recounts the Detroit hearings were interrupted by the angry wife of a Vietnam prisoner of war. “You’re using these people for your own ambitions, Mr. Kerry,” she shouted.Pat's proving to be a diligent and thorough researcher.